Page 1 of 1

Comparison between an Original 808 and the Yocto 808

Posted: Nov 21st, '14, 03:28
by discodisco
Hello all,

Yesterday i finally compared my yocto to a friend's 808. His machine is one of the best i've heard over the years.

To compare them, we programmed an identical sequence into both, then slaved them to each other via din-sync, and assigned each output to a different channel on a dj console. We were then able to easily switch back and forth using the crossfader.

We carefully listened to each part separately (1 bar machine A, move crossfader, 1 bar machine B, move crossfader, 1 bar machine A etc.... over and over)

Here's what we observed:

The Yocto Bassdrum had more volume, and also the decay pot had more decay - needed to set the pot to 7 to replicate the setting of 10 on the roland 808. The volume on the yocto was also a wee bit louder.
The high frequency (click part) of the yocto BD was more or less identical, the Sinewave part was tuned 2 semitones higher than the Roland 808.

The snare was pretty much identical at all settings - just tuned slightly differently.

The toms / congas all sounded the same (tone and a decay waveform) however the pitch range was slightly different on them) One of my toms had a different 'decay' sound to the original 808.

With careful tuning, the handclap was near identical.

The clave rimshot sounded identical except for a difference in tuning (about a tone)

The cowbell was tuned to be identical (his is tuned a bit higher than standard C/G). Here i noticed a difference - pitch and tone were identical, but the yocto has a much shorter decay.

The cymbals / hats were also identical except for the tuning.

So, OVERALL:

BD - more volume, more decay, tuning different
SD - very similar, tuning different
TOMS/CONGAS - tuning different in parts, one tom had less decay
CL/Shaker - tuning different
Handclap RS - tuning different RS is quieter..
Cowbell - less (no) decay
hats and cymbals - tuning different.

Volume of each channel slightly different between machines.

Vincent should be commended for such an amazing project!!

Btw Vincent, i want to tune all of the parts so that i can match my friends 808. Would you be able to advise what resistors need to be replaced with trimpots in each voice to achieve this?
Also, how can i increase the decay on the cowbell sound.
Finally, how can i de-crease the decay on the BD - the original limit is fine...

Re: Comparison between an Original 808 and the Yocto 808

Posted: Nov 21st, '14, 09:34
by e-licktronic
Dear discodisco,

Great Job you've done ;)
We noticed this tuning difference between Yocto and the original 808. This is due to the capacitor aging.
So if you want to tune your Yocto as your friend's TR-808 you need to change the following resistor:
  • BD tuning : R165 (increase or decrease depend your friend's TR-808 BD tuning)
    SD tuning : R195 and R196
    SD noise filter : R202
    Low Tom tuning: R228
    Middle Tom tuning : R257
    High Tom tuning : R284
    Clave/Rim tuning : R315 and R312
    Cowbell Decay : R63* and R65*
    Cymbal noise filter : R56* and R58*
    HH noise filter : R58* common with Cymbal
Finally, how can i de-crease the decay on the BD - the original limit is fine...
Do not turn the decay pot FCW :D

Best regards,
e-licktronic

Re: Comparison between an Original 808 and the Yocto 808

Posted: Nov 24th, '14, 21:17
by ElSchtroumpf
discodisco, I would like to know if you remember what frequency/note the 808 BD sine was at. I have some nice 808 samples lying around, and will run them through a scope too, but it would be nice to have a number from an original 808 for reference.

Re: Comparison between an Original 808 and the Yocto 808

Posted: Dec 1st, '14, 04:10
by discodisco
Hi ElSchtroumpf,

I will get a chance to borrow the original 808 again in a couple weeks. I will measure the pitch range of all the parts then and get back to you.
It is a very nice 808.

Re: Comparison between an Original 808 and the Yocto 808

Posted: Dec 1st, '14, 12:01
by EchoBoy
Hi DiscoDisco,
I would also be interested in the values of the TR of your friend. I borrowed one from a friend but I am not sure if it is well tuned, its tuning differs a bit from what I heard.
It could also be interesting to create a sample bank with a sample of each instrument for each min/mid/max parameter value (total of 30 samples) as reference.

Re: Comparison between an Original 808 and the Yocto 808

Posted: Dec 1st, '14, 13:06
by DeepVibes
Unless you already know this TR-808 resource site, you might be interested in this complete free sample pack : http://smd-records.com/tr808/?page_id=14
Hope this helps.

Re: Comparison between an Original 808 and the Yocto 808

Posted: Dec 1st, '14, 22:51
by EchoBoy
Thanks DeepVibes! I did not know that one. Those samples will be quite helpful!

Re: Comparison between an Original 808 and the Yocto 808

Posted: Aug 14th, '16, 15:48
by drifter7508
I have also spent some time comparing my original 808 with my Yocto. Kinda same conclusions as the thread starter.
Mainly small differences in pitch/tuning but overall spot on. (This is also true between most real 808's). Also as spoken the Cowbell has less decay.

Here's mine VS my tr-808

Must be logged in to Soundcloud to listen.
https://soundcloud.com/lostyears/yocto- ... 08/s-3M2HW

Re: Comparison between an Original 808 and the Yocto 808

Posted: Aug 23rd, '16, 23:24
by kluber
I've kind of missed out on this thread! Very interesting!
I"d love to change some resistors values!
So did someone try Vincent's advices?
Any resistor values you found?

Re: Comparison between an Original 808 and the Yocto 808

Posted: Apr 23rd, '17, 20:47
by pistrix
e-licktronic wrote: Clave/Rim tuning : R315 and R312
It's actually R310 (for OSC1 of RS) and R308 (for OSC2 of RS/CL) that adjust the Clave/Rim Tuning.

And although the Rimshot uses both oscillators, while the Clave uses only oscillator #2, just changing R308 (for OSC2) works great for adjusting the tuning of both sounds.