C89 and C163 was 47nfKlangGenerator wrote: Regarding C89 and C163: they are already 10nf/ 0,01uf. Is this a typing error?

Best regards,
e-licktronic
C89 and C163 was 47nfKlangGenerator wrote: Regarding C89 and C163: they are already 10nf/ 0,01uf. Is this a typing error?